Like most people I talk to in the Environmental Studies program
say, when I came to college I had to relearn almost everything that I valued as
truth. Left and right I am constantly checking old habits and archaic ways of
seeing the world which has now situated me in my last semester of the
Environmental Studies program. When I learned about climate change in high school
I didn’t have the “affective” response that Sarah Ray describes in her chapter “The
Affective Arc of Undergraduate Environmental Studies Curricula” mostly because
I never felt like it was my problem,
surely because of my privilege. However, learning about the intensity of ecological
disaster alongside social justice issues that interconnect has taken my through
an “affective rollercoaster” as Ray would say. I did see a decline in my mental
health while my perception of reality shattered all around me, but slowly I
began to find empowerment through articles I read and lectures that I heard revolving
around community action. So when Ray states “Students’ deep engagement with the
material is a sign of success, and our task is to politicize and direct those
emotions in ways that give them a sense that they are improving the world” (Ray
2), she is explaining that the very ES curriculum forces the students to be
engaged with the world around them for the sake of not only their community,
but for their own mental health. This program has pushed me to be someone I
never thought I could be, and on a good day, empowered in my own agency.
No comments:
Post a Comment